Oravia Intelligence - Transform EU Policy Documents into Actionable Intelligence

Public Consultation Response Analysis

Process hundreds or thousands of stakeholder submissions to EU public consultations - from "Have Your Say" portal contributions to formal position papers. From each response, extract: respondent identification and category (business, NGO, citizen, public authority), key policy positions taken, specific legislative articles referenced, proposed amendments or alternatives, and supporting evidence cited. Respondents/responses can be classified by theme, topics, stakeholder type, or sector of activity.

Output: Structured dataset with response profiling, position mapping by article/issue, argument taxonomy, sentiment scores, and cross-respondent consensus analysis.

Consultations Stakeholder Feedback Opinion Mining

Try our free EU Consultation Explorer

Policy Brief Synthesis

Synthesize insights from policy briefs, working papers, and research reports published by think tanks, academic institutions, and international organizations (OECD, World Bank, IMF). From each source, extract: policy recommendations with specificity level, underlying evidence base (studies cited, data sources), causal mechanisms proposed, implementation considerations, success criteria suggested, and international comparisons referenced. Recommendations are classified by policy instrument type (regulatory, fiscal, voluntary), theme, topic, target actor, and implementation timeline.

Output: Evidence synthesis matrix mapping recommendations to supporting research, convergence analysis across sources, organised across themes, topics, and target actors.

Think Tanks Recommendations Evidence Base

Impact Assessment Synthesis

Extract structured data from EC Impact Assessments and accompanying Staff Working Documents. From these 200+ page documents, capture: problem definition and market failures identified, policy options evaluated (including baseline), quantified economic costs and benefits (compliance costs, administrative burden, GDP effects), environmental impacts (emissions, resource use), social implications (employment, SME effects, regional distribution), and stakeholder consultation summaries. Each impact is classified by type (direct/indirect), certainty level, and time horizon.

Output: Comparative option matrix with monetized impacts where available, distributional analysis by stakeholder group, and subsidiary/proportionality assessment summary.

Impact Analysis Policy Options Evidence Synthesis

Position Paper Analysis

Analyze position papers, policy briefs, and advocacy documents from industry federations, trade associations, NGOs, trade unions, and research institutions. From each document, extract: organization profile and represented interests, key policy demands with priority ranking, specific article-by-article positions, supporting arguments and evidence cited, proposed alternative text, implementation concerns raised, and red lines identified. Positions are classified by stance (support, oppose, conditional support), intensity (strong, moderate, neutral), and alignment with other stakeholders.

Output: Issue-by-issue stakeholder position matrix, coalition mapping visualization, argument inventory with frequency analysis, and conflict/consensus heat maps.

Stakeholder Mapping Advocacy Interest Groups

EU Legislation Comparison

Compare multiple versions of EU directives, regulations, or delegated acts across the legislative cycle—Commission proposal, Parliament amendments, Council position, and final adopted text. From each version, extract article-by-article text, recital language, definitions, obligations, and deadlines. Changes are classified as: substantive modifications (scope, thresholds, requirements), procedural changes (timelines, reporting), drafting clarifications, or structural reorganization. Track which institution introduced each change.

Output: Article-level diff table with change type classification, institutional attribution, and impact severity rating for each modification.

Legislative Tracking Amendments Monitoring Change Analysis

National Transposition Monitoring

Track how EU directives are transposed into national legislation across Member States by processing national implementing laws, decrees, and regulations. From each national measure, extract: transposing legal instrument references, article-by-article correspondence to the directive, national implementation choices (where directive allows flexibility), stricter national standards ("gold-plating"), designated competent authorities, and national sanction regimes. Differences are classified as: minimum harmonization choices, administrative variations, potential non-compliance, or enhanced protection measures.

Output: 27-country comparison matrix with transposition status, correlation tables linking directive articles to national provisions, and deviation register, topics and target actors.

Compliance Monitoring Member States Implementation

Parliamentary Amendment Tracking

Process amendment documents from European Parliament committee reports and plenary sessions. From each amendment, extract: targeted article/recital, original Commission text, proposed new wording, sponsoring MEP(s) and their political group affiliation, justification text provided, and co-signatories. Amendments are classified by type (deletion, addition, modification, compromise), thematic category (scope, definitions, obligations, exemptions, enforcement), and political orientation (strengthening/weakening regulation, pro-industry/pro-environment positions).

Output: Searchable amendment database, with vote outcomes where available, and thematic clustering of similar amendments across files.

EP Amendments Legislative Process Political Mapping

Meeting Minutes Extraction

Process meeting minutes and summary records from EU comitology committees, Council working groups, trilogue negotiations, and expert group sessions. From each document, extract: date, participants and their affiliations, agenda items discussed, positions expressed by delegation or institution, decisions taken (with voting records where available), action items assigned with responsible parties and deadlines, and unresolved issues flagged for follow-up. Discussion items are classified by topic area, decision status (agreed, pending, deferred), and level of contention.

Output: Chronological decision register, action item tracker with status monitoring, position evolution timeline by actor, and issue progression analysis across meeting series.

Committees Governance Decision Tracking

Grant Application Screening

Process grant applications submitted to EU funding programs (Horizon Europe, LIFE, Erasmus+, CEF, cohesion funds). From each proposal, extract: project title and acronym, lead applicant and consortium partners with roles, requested EU contribution and total budget, work package structure, key performance indicators proposed, deliverables and milestones, and declared expected impacts. Applications are classified by call topic alignment, Technology Readiness Level, geographic coverage, and partner type mix (academia, industry, SME, public sector). Eligibility criteria are automatically checked against call requirements.

Output: Application comparison dashboard with eligibility flags, thematic clustering, budget distribution analysis, and consortium network visualization.

EU Funding Project Review Application Processing

CAP Interventions Classification

Analyze Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plans and intervention descriptions from all 27 Member States. From each intervention, extract: eligibility conditions for beneficiaries, commitment requirements and duration, topics and themes, farm practices, result indicators linked. Interventions are classified by topics, themes, farm practices, type of beneficiary and tagged by environmental ambition level.

Output: Cross-country intervention database enabling comparison of national approaches, budget allocation analysis by topics, themes, farm practices, and environmental ambition benchmarking.

CAP Agricultural Policy Rural Development

Environmental Impact Statement Extraction

Process Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs), and Appropriate Assessments under Habitats Directive. From these multi-hundred page technical reports, extract: project description and alternatives considered, baseline environmental conditions, identified impacts by receptor (air quality, water, soil, noise, biodiversity, landscape, climate), significance assessments, cumulative impact analysis, proposed mitigation and compensation measures, residual impacts after mitigation, and monitoring program specifications. Impacts are classified by magnitude (negligible to major), duration (temporary/permanent), reversibility, and geographic extent.

Output: Structured impact register with mitigation linkages, monitoring requirements tracker, and comparative project database for precedent analysis.

EIA Environmental Assessment Project Screening

Sustainability Report Analysis

Extract structured ESG data from corporate sustainability reports, non-financial statements, and CSRD-compliant disclosures. From each report, capture: environmental metrics (GHG emissions Scope 1/2/3, energy consumption, water use, waste generation), social indicators (workforce composition, health & safety, training hours), governance disclosures (board diversity, ethics policies, due diligence processes), targets set with base years and timelines, progress against previous commitments, and reporting frameworks applied (GRI, ESRS, TCFD, SASB). Disclosures are classified by ESRS topic, materiality assessment outcome, and data quality level (measured, estimated, third-party verified).

Output: Normalized ESG database enabling peer benchmarking, disclosure completeness scoring, target achievement tracking, and year-over-year performance analysis.

ESG CSRD Corporate Reporting

Carbon Credit Documentation Review

Analyze carbon credit project documentation including Project Design Documents (PDDs), validation reports, monitoring reports, and verification statements across standards (Verra VCS, Gold Standard, American Carbon Registry). From each project, extract: project type and methodology applied, geographic location and boundaries, baseline scenario and additionality justification, estimated vs. verified emission reductions, crediting period and vintages, permanence risk assessment, co-benefits claimed (SDG contributions), and buffer pool contributions. Projects are classified by sectoral scope (forestry, renewable energy, cookstoves, etc.), activity type, and risk category.

Output: Project quality assessment database with methodology compliance checks, vintage distribution, co-benefit verification status, and integrity risk scoring.

Carbon Markets Offsets Climate Finance

Green Bond Framework Analysis

Analyze green, social, sustainability, and sustainability-linked bond frameworks alongside Second Party Opinions (SPOs) and allocation/impact reports. From each framework, extract: eligible project categories with inclusion/exclusion criteria, environmental objectives targeted, EU Taxonomy alignment claims by activity, process for project evaluation and selection, management of proceeds mechanics, and reporting commitments. From SPOs, capture assessor opinion and sustainability quality scoring. From impact reports, extract allocated amounts by category and reported impact metrics. Frameworks are classified by bond type (use of proceeds vs. KPI-linked), ambition level, and Taxonomy alignment degree.

Output: Framework comparison database with eligibility criteria mapping, SPO scoring aggregation, allocation tracking, and impact metric standardization across issuers.

Green Bonds Sustainable Finance Use of Proceeds

Biodiversity Assessment Extraction

Process ecological survey reports, habitat assessments, Natura 2000 compatibility studies, and biodiversity impact analyses. From each assessment, extract: species inventories with scientific and common names, population estimates and distribution data, conservation status (IUCN Red List, Habitats Directive Annexes, national protection status), habitat types mapped using EUNIS classification, connectivity and ecological corridor analysis, identified threats and pressures, mitigation hierarchy application (avoid, minimize, restore, offset), and compensation ratios proposed. Species are classified by protection level, sensitivity to project impacts, and priority for conservation action.

Output: Species and habitat database with spatial mapping, protection requirement register, mitigation measure tracker, and biodiversity net gain/loss calculation inputs.

Biodiversity Nature Conservation Species Protection

Due Diligence Document Review

Process large document sets in M&A or investment due diligence data rooms—corporate records, permits and licenses, material contracts, employment agreements, litigation files, insurance policies, and regulatory correspondence. From each document, extract: document type and date, parties involved, key terms and obligations, expiration and renewal provisions, change of control clauses, termination rights, liability caps, and identified risks or red flags. Documents are classified by workstream (legal, financial, operational, environmental, HR), risk level (high, medium, low), and deal relevance (critical, important, routine). Findings are linked to disclosure schedules and representations.

Output: Searchable due diligence findings database with risk register, key contract terms summary, issues list with materiality assessment, and document-to-issue cross-reference map.

M&A Due Diligence Corporate Transactions

News and Media Monitoring

Process news articles, press releases, trade publications, and social media content for policy-relevant intelligence. From each item, extract: headline and publication details, organizations and individuals mentioned, policy topics and legislative files referenced, key claims and statements attributed, data points and statistics cited, and geographic focus. Content is classified by source type (mainstream media, trade press, wire service, opinion), topic taxonomy aligned to your monitoring priorities, sentiment toward key entities (positive, negative, neutral), and narrative framing. Emerging issues and storyline evolution are tracked over time.

Output: Media intelligence dashboard with entity mention tracking, sentiment trends, topic heat maps, source influence weighting, and narrative development timeline.

Media Monitoring Communications Reputation Management

Knowledge Hub Document Processing

Process diverse document collections (policy reports, research papers, legislation, briefs) to build structured, searchable knowledge hubs. From each document, extract: document metadata (title, author, publication date, source, document type, language), primary and secondary topics identified with thematic classification, tailored abstract and executive summary, key concepts and keywords, document structure (table of contents, section hierarchy), important quotes and notable statements, entities mentioned (organizations, individuals, locations), references and citations, and cross-document relationships. Documents are classified by policy domain, sectoral focus, content type, and target audience to enable advanced search, topic navigation, and knowledge discovery.

Output: Structured knowledge base with rich metadata, topic mapping, searchable abstracts, entity extraction, citation networks, and cross-document relationship mapping.

Knowledge Management Document Indexing Information Architecture

Transform Policy Documents into Actionable Intelligence

Extract data or insights from PDFs

Classify and tag content with AI

Beyond Extraction

Choose Your Path

Oravia Platform

Small Project

Large Project

Contact

Contact

Define Extraction Needs

Define Needs

Process

Process

Review/Adjust

Review

Delivery